Posts

​The Architecture of "Systems Abuse": When the State Becomes a Facilitator for Organised Crime

on

When "Safety" Voices Use Guns to Kill Competition 🎤⬇️ That Safety Authority is a Cover, you've all been fooled!

on

STATEMENT OF CONTENTIONS (Magistrates Court Case AND IBAC CASE) - What happens when you go to the police with recordings of a bikie-linked extortion threat, and they turn their body cams off and call an ambulance to take you away?

on

1,000 Attempts to Be Heard: 17 Pages of Proof and 0 Actions Taken

on

THE INSIDE JOB: How a St Kilda Building Manager Turned a Blind Eye to an OMCG Takeover.

on

I felt the weight of a juice bottle in my hand. * I stood in line and purchased my own food.

on

VICPOLS use of Section 351 of the Mental Health Act (the power to apprehend and refer someone for a mental health assessment) is frequently criticised for being inappropriate, coercive, or used as a "catch-all" for complex social issues.

on

Complex Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD) in victims of organised crime is a severe, chronic condition resulting from prolonged exposure to traumatic events where escape is difficult or impossible

on

In Victoria, a person becomes a co-conspirator to a crime (an indictable offence) when they reach an agreement with one or more other people to pursue a course of conduct that will involve the commission of that offence. Under Section 321 of the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic), the threshold is established when the following elements are proven: An Agreement: Two or more parties agree to commit a crime. Intent: The accused must intend that the offence be committed. Belief in Circumstances: The accused must believe that any necessary facts or circumstances will exist at the time the crime is committed. Overt Act (Sometimes): While the agreement alone can constitute conspiracy, the law may require an "overt act" in furtherance of that agreement. Key Threshold Requirements Agreement vs. Discussion: The law distinguishes between merely discussing a crime and actually agreeing to it. Only an agreement or understanding, not just negotiations, creates liability. Intent to Commit: A person must have the specific intention to carry out the criminal act; mere knowledge that a crime might happen is not enough. No Overt Act Necessary in Some Cases: Conspiracy is generally completed once the agreement is made, even if the crime itself is never committed. Impossibility: A person can be guilty of conspiracy even if it was impossible for them to actually commit the offence, provided they believed it was possible. What is NOT Conspiracy Mere Presence: Being present at the scene of a crime does not make someone a co-conspirator or accomplice. Unilateral Action: A person cannot "conspire" alone; there must be at least one other party to the agreement. Distinction: Conspiracy vs. Complicity Conspiracy (s 321): The agreement to commit the crime. Complicity (s 323): Assisting, encouraging, or directing the commission of an actual crime, which requires more direct participation than just conspiring. Disclaimer: Criminal law is complex. If you are facing charges, it is essential to seek advice from a legal professional

on

Digital threats to physical intimidation involving OMCG (Outlaw Motorcycle Gang) associates—paints a clear picture of predatory extortion.

on

In victoria whats the threshold quiet loss of enjoyment?

on

THE SURVIVOR’S GAMBIT: How Tactical Compliance Outsmarted a Siege

on